|
← Previous · Home · Next →
2009·01·24 · 2 Comments |
| Rethinking |
During the last few decades, it has been decided that we have been “doing church” all wrong. That is the reason for the cultural decline in religiosity, and the consequential rise in numbers of the “unchurched.” If we could only find the right way to “do church,” surely people would want to be a part of it. And so a number of “experts” have been “rethinking the church.” According to David Wells, this is energy misdirected. “It is not the church we need to rethink,” he writes. “Rather, it is our thoughts about the church that need to be rethought.”
In my view, so much of this rethinking confuses rethinking the nature of the church with rethinking its performance. For the multitude of pragmatists who are leading churches in America today, these are one and the same thing. The church is nothing but its performance. There is nothing to be said about the church that cannot be reduced to how it is doing, and that is a matter for constant inventories, poll taking, daily calculations, and strategizing.
I beg to differ. These are two entirely different matters. We intrude into what is not our business when, in our earnest pursuit of success in the church, which we think we can manufacture, we confuse its performance with its nature. Let me explain.
The church is not our creation. It is not our business. We are not called upon to manage it. It is not there for us to advance our careers in it. It is not there for our own success. It is not a business. The church, in fact, was never our idea in the first place. No, it is not the church we need to rethink.
Rather it is our thoughts about the church that need to be rethought. It is the church’s faithfulness that needs to be reexamined. It is its faithfulness to who it is in Christ, its faithfulness in living out its life in the world, that should be occupying us,. The church, after all, is not under our management but under God’s sovereign care, and what he sees as health is very often rather different from what we imagine its health to be.
The church, let us remember, is called the “church of God” (Gal. 1:13; 1 Cor. 15:9). Churches are “the churches of Christ” (Rom. 16.16) because they are his, bought by his precious blood. Christ not only constituted the church (Math. 16:18), but God has given us the blueprint of its life in Scripture. What we need to do, then, first and foremost, is to replicates his thoughts about it. We need to ask ourselves how well, or how badly, we are realizing our life in Christ in the church, how far and how well churches stand out as the outposts of the kingdom of God in our particular culture.
—David F. Wells, The Courage to Be Protestant: Truth Lovers, Marketers, and Emergents in the Postmodern World (Eerdmans, 2008), 222–223.
In my view, so much of this rethinking confuses rethinking the nature of the church with rethinking its performance. For the multitude of pragmatists who are leading churches in America today, these are one and the same thing. The church is nothing but its performance. There is nothing to be said about the church that cannot be reduced to how it is doing, and that is a matter for constant inventories, poll taking, daily calculations, and strategizing. 



















2 Comments:
Betsy Markman
Oh, amen to this! So many churches have confused themselves with Christ. They believe that what the world needs is church, and if we have to stray from Christ in order to get people into church, that's a reasonable sacrifice! They argue, "Once you get them in the doors, then you give them Christ." But somehow it doesn't seem to work that way. "We've got them in the doors, and now we don't want to offend them!" So the truth goes out the window.
On Judgment day, no one will stand before God and argue, "I rejected Jesus because I didn't like the church's music." The condemnation is that men love darkness rather than light, and this is what will condemn people outside the faith. Had they loved Christ, had they desired Him, the church wouldn't have been able to keep them out!
But what will be the defense of those who say, "We rejected Christ because He wasn't relevant to our attendance-building program?" How will the One whose cross is an offense respond to those who didn't want to offend? How will the One who bore our reproaches respond to those who aren't willing to bear His?
Will there not be many who hear, "Depart from me, I never knew you?"
steve martin
"Will there not be many who hear, "Depart from me, I never knew you?"
Unfortunately yes.