Previous · Home · Next
2009·06·13 · 2 Comments
Still Not a Trekkie

As I mentioned last week, the Mrs and me went to see Star Trek on Monday. I’m sorry to say I was not impressed. If I had never seen Star Trek before, and so knew nothing about it, I would have thought it was okay. As it was, it just did not ring true. My complaints:

img

  • The problems begin early, when we are introduced to a teen-aged James T. Kirk. Young Jim steals a classic Corvette, drives it like a pro, and wrecks it. Of course we all know (don’t we?) that later in life, when it becomes necessary for Captain Kirk to drive a car, he doesn’t know how, having never done it.
  • The creative minds behind the movie seemed to follow the philosophy currently popular among writers and directors, i.e., keep it moving fast with plenty of action, and no one will notice how thin the plot and/or how one-dimensional the characters. Star Trek was never predominantly an action show. It was a drama, focusing more on strategy than actual combat. This Star Trek seemed to major in cool fight scenes.
  • Finally — and this one is just unforgivable — a Spock-Uhura romance? I could maybe overlook the movie’s other failings, but that was just stupid.

Having grossed $226,428,402 (as of 11 June), it is the third highest grossing movie of the last year, so I would guess an entirely unnecessary sequel will be coming. Sad, really.

2 Comments:

1. 09·06·13··10:28
Mike

They are clearly "restarting" the series with the whole change-the-past concept. By doing that, they have papered over alot of things that weren't canon. Thus, Kirk knew how to drive a car this time because this time he ended up in a situation where he needed to....whereas before he had his dad around. Spock's mom died this time. And this time Spock/Uhura are an item.

Whether or not any of the new plot elements work...I dunno. I agree, Uhura/Spock is kind of a stretch. But they seem to have definitely kept the original characters and spirit of the show while simultaneously creating a ton of new fans. Whatever the plot issues, it's mission accomplished for them.

2. 09·06·13··11:14
David

“Whatever the plot issues, it's mission accomplished for them.”

If by “mission” you mean “make a pile of money,” you’re right. Understand, I’m not against making piles of money. I’m probably as pure a capitalist as you’ll ever meet. But there’s the issue of artistic integrity, too. If you want to create a new character, then be truly creative and create a new character. Don’t recreate an established character.

The problem (for the writers) is that it might be impossible to write the story they want around the characters they want, as established. And to write an entirely new story would forfeit the commercial capital of the original. So what we have is a combination of a lack of imagination and lazy opportunism.

So, now that you’ve got me thinking about it, it’s worse than I thought!

(commenting rules)

Post a comment


2010 Band of Bloggers
On the Web
Scripture references on this site
are linked to RefTagger
Choose your translation →
Recent comments:

hammaneousymn on State of the Blog Update

Dan Phillips on My 99¢ Worth

threegirldad on Facebook Saga

donsands on Bork Bork Bork!

Steve Weaver on Together for the Gospel 2010

David on Facebook

Kim in ON on Lord’s Day 10, 2010

Presently reading: .

» Who Is Jesus? «

The Thirsty Theologian Bookstore Books read/reading this year:
Background image:
Saint Augustine by Sandro Botticelli, 1480