Previous · Home · Next
2009·07·24
Book Review: The Advent of Evangelicalism

This is review is courtesy of my pastor, Jerry Drebelbis. The book in review, The Advent of Evangelicalism: Exploring Historical Continuities, can be purchased here, or you may download the table of contents and a sample chapter here.

The Advent of Evangelicalism: Exploring Historical Continuities:1
A review by Jerome Drebelbis

img   At first glance Haykin and Stewart’s edited analytical essays on David Bebbington’s 1989 work, Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1960s, is rather daunting covering 432 pages. But moving into the various analyses from different scholar’s perspective proved both profitable and interesting. Value in reading such an analysis can be found on several levels.

Analysis of a classic:
   Now some twenty years after publication Bebbington’s work is considered a classic. His study and analysis of evangelical movement, thought and doctrine as influenced by Enlightenment philosophy is considered by some a “seminal study of great importance.”2 Because of the importance of Bebbington’s study a second look is always worthwhile. Thus Haykin and Stewart’s edited volume is both timely and valuable. Every contributor goes to great length to examine various aspects of Bebbington’s thesis. Did evangelicalism begin in the mid-eighteenth century? Just how influential, if at all, were Enlightenment philosophers on Christian theology and practice? Can the evangelical movement truly be characterized by Bebbington’s “quadrilateral” elements, biblicist, conversionist, cruciform and activist?
   These and other issues are brought to the forefront for analysis as each contributor examines one or more of the elements and attempts to answer the question. Did evangelicalism being in the mid-eighteenth century and can it be typified by these four elements? How each contributor approached the topics proved interesting and fully worthwhile both from an historical standpoint but also from a theological perspective. Each contributor assists in bringing precision to Bebbinton’s thesis but even more so gives sharper focus to the time period and preceding factors.

Organization:
   To answer these questions and bring precision to the issue, The Advent of Evangelicalism is very nicely organized into four sections (it’s own “quadralateral” if you will); an introduction, a geographical regional perspectives, analysis of eras, and finally from a doctrinal (or theological) analysis. In each case the contributor was quite thorough, given subject limitations, in his analysis providing copious quotations and bibliographical references. Thus, we’re given a broad viewpoint of the evangelical movement both synchronically and diachronically. This was very helpful in that the reader is given a better understanding of the evangelical movement not only in a particular country but also through time.

Theological:
   The main theme in Bebbington’s work was that Enlightenment thought and its philosophers heavily influenced evangelicals. Of particular interest was the contributor’s discussion on theological diversity and continuity within the period and their understanding of thought and theology as it related to the Enlightenment. This discussion was very beneficial to those of us who normally do not study the movement or evolution of theological thought from one century to another. Most helpful was the analysis of various denominational distinctions and how they may or may not have been influenced by enlightenment ideas. For example John Coffey notes that the differences were more a matter of “one of degree,” and “even the politics of evangelicalism owed much to Puritanism.”3

Conclusion:
   The Advent of Evangelicalism gives us a better understanding of ecclesiastical history not only of the 18th century but the time leading up to it. Examining the subject from a broader chronological perspective, regional differences and theological standpoints was very beneficial. But in another sense the work is also comforting. The reader is given a better understanding that historically and theologically evangelicalism’s roots are not necessarily tainted with humanistic enlightenment as we may be led to believe. Rather the roots from which evangelicals are born are from sound theological thought emanating from centuries prior as the Holy Spirit worked in and through his Church in time and events.

1 Haykin, Michael, A.G. & Stewart, Kenneth J., The Advent of Evangelicalism: Exploring Historical Continuities: B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, 2008 ↑ 

2 ibid, p. 13 ↑ 

3 Ibid, pg. 269 ↑ 


Comments on this post are closed. If you have a question or comment concerning this post, feel free to email us.

On the Web
Scripture references on this site
are linked to RefTagger
Choose your translation →
Recent comments:

David on My Song-Writing Debut

Mark Olson on Perpetually Virgin, or Without Sin?

David on “No one reads Dean Ryle”

Daniel on Inspecting the Fruit

Victoria on Hymns of My Youth: My God! How Wonderful Thou Art

David on Respectors of Persons

Marla on Hard Hearts, Death, and the Gospel

Presently reading: .

» Who Is Jesus? «

The Thirsty Theologian Bookstore Books read/reading this year:
Background image:
Saint Augustine by Sandro Botticelli, 1480