I bet you thought I had either forgotten this post or just chickened out. Well, here I am. The question I was asked about ecclesiology was not as specific as I would have liked. In fact, it was not specific at all. The querulous one, J.D. Hatfield, was quite brief. I quote:

Ecclesiology

In my last Ask Thirsty post, I promised to answer your questions concerning my eschatology. I also promised that my answers would be disappointing. I will now demonstrate that I am a man of my word. I anticipate being taken outside the camp and stoned afterwards.

Thanks to all of you who have submitted questions to the Ask Thirsty post. You are probably thinking by now that I have chickened out and decided to ignore your questions and hope you forget. That would be mostly incorrect. With the exception of the two who asked about eschatology, and some of those submitted by email (are you serious?), I am completely unintimidated.

Those of you who frequent this blog know that I am not a prolific blogger. That is not because I have nothing to say. I have an opinion, usually a very strong opinion, about almost everything. Theology, politics, personal relationships, sports, leisure, personal hygeine - you name it, I have an opinion. The problem I have is that most of those opinions are either not important, not interesting, or have already been better stated by someone else (see OnTheWeb and 2Corinthians10:4-5 in the sidebar).