“There is nothing you can do to save yourself. Everything necessary for your salvation has been done through the death of Jesus Christ. All you must do is believe. Now, the choice is yours: to believe or not.”
| Category Archive Complete Archives | |
| Free Will | (3 posts) |
Before Christmas I asked whether or not we believe anything by choice. Most of the comments agreed that we do not. Today I want to explain why I believe that is true. This post will probably be somewhat redundant, and I will no doubt belabor the point, but I want to leave no holes in this argument because it is crucial to my understanding of the relationship of the will to salvation.
Proposition: It is impossible to choose what one believes.
The desk I am sitting behind is solid oak. I believe it is solid oak. I believe that because I know a few facts about it. (1) I chose the lumber myself at the lumber yard. It was labeled as red oak. It could possibly have been labeled incorrectly, but (2) I know what oak looks like. I know what color it is, and I know what the grain looks like. I know what it smells like, and I even know what it tastes like (although I did not taste it). This wood has all the physical characteristics of red oak. (3) Other people who know wood have commented on the oak furnishings in my office. They recognized it as oak without any prior suggestion that it was oak. These facts have convinced me that my desk is solid oak. Knowing these facts, I cannot believe otherwise.
I have a friend who is an attorney. I haven’t been to his office in a long time, and I don’t remember what his desk looks like. If he told me it was oak or mahogany, or something else, I would believe it based on facts that I know: (1) my friend is known by me to be honest, and (2) even if he was not honest, I would doubt any motivation to lie about such a thing. I believe the information because I trust the source.
Now, someone might say, in the case of information that lacks proof one way or another that one might choose to believe it. I have heard that language used, and I may have used it myself. Perhaps a child has proven himself untrustworthy. I will probably, for a time, restrict his freedom to limit his opportunities for mischief. When it seems appropriate, I will give him his freedom back, with the understanding that he will not repeat the infraction. He promises that he can be trusted, and I “believe” him. But I don’t necessarily really believe him. I don’t necessarily believe he will fail, either. I don’t actually believe either way. I am simply proceeding as though I believe him, giving him the opportunity to convince me.
Conversely, someone might say he refuses to believe something. Something might be so distasteful or abhorrent to him that he refuses to acknowledge the possibility that it is true. The truth is that he is either (1) denying facts that he actually believes so that he is free to proceed in a way that he could not if he acknowledged the truth, or (2) closing his mind to any information that might convince him, purposely remaining ignorant.
When we say we are choosing to believe, we really mean that we are proceeding as though we believe. We are testing claims to see if they are true. Our “choice to believe” might be anything from being pretty sure to wishful thinking; but it is not genuine belief. Genuine belief is, in all cases, involuntary and irresistible.
This is not a theological issue. It is simply a fact that cannot be denied. We believe what we know. Our knowledge might be incorrect, and we may be wrong, but belief is based on knowledge, and we cannot honestly deny what we know.
It must also be said that belief and faith are not synonymous. However, the same principle applies if we are claiming that faith is exercised by free will. Faith is trust in what we believe, or trust in the source of what we believe; so varying interpretations of Ephesians 2:8 are not going to throw me off at all.
I have said that this is not a theological issue, and so far it is not. The theological implications will come in a later post.
In my last post on this subject, I established the fact that the will is not a factor in what we believe. Everything we believe is a result of information we have received and are convinced is true and cannot honestly deny.
So what can the will do? In short, nothing. The will is not a power that can accomplish anything. It is simply our desire, our “want to.” I want to get up in the morning, but just laying there and willing myself out of bed won’t do it.
When we say “free will,” we really mean “freedom to do as we will.” The question, then, is this: are we free to do what we want to do? I believe the answer is yes, absolutely, within the limits of our abilities. Our abilities are limited by who, or what, we are. I am not a bird, so I cannot fly.
More importantly, though, our desires are a product of who we are. We all have different desires based on our different personalities. But we all have one thing in common: we are all sinful beings, born in sin, so our desires are products of our sinful nature. We are all free to do as we will, and here is the statement—the fact, I believe—that will get me tied to the stake and burned as a heretic: God does not violate our free will. Bear with me, please. While the Calvinists may tie me to the stake now, when I am finished, it will be an Arminian who lights the flame.
We are free do as we will. We make free choices. We can even read God’s commands and choose to obey them, if we will.* But we always choose what we want, and as unregenerate sinners, we never want what God wants. We always want whatever suits our own interests.
So I have asked, of what value is free will to the unregenerate? It is of no value whatsoever. The power to make free choices has no bearing on what we believe, and the one thing that must be done to be saved is to “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 16:31). Free will has value only to those who have been saved, a fact I will discuss in another post.
