Today brings your last chance to win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul. To enter, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 12” in the subject line

Due to the fact that international shipping rates are about twice the value of the book, I won’t be shipping outside the U.S.

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (June 18), and the winner will be notified by email.

. . . and that’s how I combine another The Holiness of God drawing with this:

I have delivered babies. Six of our children were born at home, two with a midwife, and four without, so I know a bit about childbirth. I’m also a pretty good inventor. If I need something that isn’t readily available, I’ll usually figure something out and create it. If it sounds like I’m going somewhere scary with this, you’re right. But you have no idea how scary. Just so there’s no mistake, this isn’t my invention; crazy as my Mrs. thinks I am, I never would have thought of Birth by Centrifugal Force (those currently with child might want to brace themselves before clicking).

Alright, then! Everybody still with me?

Now it’s time to give away the penultimate copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul. To enter, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 11” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (June 11), and the winner will be notified by email. Another drawing, the final one this time, will be announced next Saturday.

Our Fridays are (usually) dedicated to the promotion of liberty.

It just occurred to me this morning that I passed a couple of blog anniversary dates this week. Tuesday, June 1st, was the fifth anniversary of this blog. It also marked two years of daily blogging. That’s 730 days straight without skipping, or 733 through today. That’s nothing compared to 2,408 days, but it’s a moderately big deal to me.

So how is this “sort of” a Freedom Friday post? It’s like this: I began daily blogging as a kind of discipline to push me to read more and better, and it served that purpose quite well. But I’ve gotten tired. What used to be a good thing has become a burden, and it’s not really working any more. Consequently, I’m thinking — only thinking at this point — of liberating myself from the obligation. If I can’t put my heart into my blogging so that it once again becomes a sharpening tool, you may see a cessation of daily activity here. Don’t worry, it won’t mean I’m dead.

Then again, maybe it will. You never know.

I was also supposed to have my biennial facelift up this week. I started work on it several weeks ago, and then completely forgot about it. I’ll get it done eventually. Or maybe I’ll just go with this one.

. . . and I win the prize for Most Deceptive Title on a Blog Post.

Have you ever wondered, Dear Readers, “Where does this guy come up with some his weird ideas?” Well, here’s your answer: a brain that runs open-source software and short-circuits every now and then. Here’s a small window into the mind that is mine.

When this article came through my RSS reader, the headline read More women earning more than hubby. Scanning quickly as usual, I read Women earning more than one hubby. I thought, earning? Like, say, earning a trip to the woodshed? Naturally, I was then reminded of the Addams Family episode in which Morticia (one of the hottest babes ever to grace the small screen, if you ask me) asks, “Gomez, do you know what the penalty is for bigamy?” to which Gomez replies, “Of course — two wives.”

Speaking of two wives (not really, but I have to segue somehow), it is time for another The Holiness of God giveaway. The rules remain the same. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

Free RC!

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 9” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (May 28), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday. There are still a few copies remaining, so if you haven’t won, keep trying.

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time for the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 8” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (May 21), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday. There are still several copies remaining, so if you haven’t won, keep trying.

Update: NGM Planet has been shut down. The ngmen.net domain was sold on eBay for $.06 on May 23.

I was surprised yesterday to be one of several victims of content theft. It all began Sunday night when I posted Monday morning’s entry before going to bed. Since my post referenced a post at Between Two Worlds, I left a trackback there as well before turning in. That, my friends, is a big deal, because, as any blogger who watches stats and has ever had a link from that site knows, there is a Justin Taylor effect. That is, rather than the usual traffic, you will get approximately thirty-seven jillion hits. Taylor moderates his feedback, so I checked back in the morning to see if my trackback had been published. It had (I thought), but it looked . .  different. So I clicked through.

To my dismay, I found my full post, image included, just like I expected to see it, but on a different site. (Check it for yourself. The only way you would ever know who the author was would be to click the “Previous/Next post” links at the bottom of the page (there is a blogroll-style list of “contributors” in the sidebar, also). Otherwise, the reader is left, intentionally or not, to assume that the site owner is the author of the post (the only exception being someone like Phil Johnson, who includes his name, along with multiple branded graphics, within each post). Consequently, my thirty-seven jillion hits are being hijacked by this aggregator site. Though the site owner claims to be “push[ing] viewers back to the original sites,” his URL (site address) has never, to my recollection, turned up in my stats.

So I shot off a polite, if annoyed, email:

To Whom It May Concern:

Last night (May 9) I posted an article on my site (Prayer for the Unknown on The Thirsty Theologian). I then posted a trackback at Justin Taylor’s blog, Between Two Worlds. Imagine my surprise when, this morning, I discovered not my trackback to my site, but one to NGM Planet where I found my full post and The Thirsty Theologian listed as a “contributor” in the sidebar. What is the meaning of this? I have no wish to judge your motives in this; I’m sure you mean nothing untoward. However, I must ask that you discontinue hijacking my content. If you wish, you are welcome to post short excerpts with links back to my site. That is a normally accepted practice.

Thank you,

David Kjos
The Thirsty Theologian

. . . and the following exchange ensued:

Mr Kjos:

If you would note on the about page (http://ngmen.net/?page_id=2), we do not "hijack" anyone's content, we aggregate and point to the originals for proper attribution of the authors. We do not collect comments/etc there, but push viewers back to the original sites for further discussion, etc.

Perhaps you are familiar with other "planet" sites (using either the FeedWordPress plugin we use or the python-based Planet tool (http://www.planetplanet.org/)) which also aggregate RSS feeds into one central source, linking back out to the originals for conversation, etc.

I will happily delink you from our aggregator if you prefer.

-Warren Myers

Mr, Myers:

Really, now, who do you think you're fooling? Surely, you must see that few people will ever find their way to the sites from whom you re-appropriate (to be kindly euphemistic) your content. Why would they? And what indication is there that they should? The plain fact is that I have never, to my knowledge, ever received any traffic from your site. No one who has read my work on NGM Planet knows who wrote it. I checked with another, much more popular blogger whose work you siphon, and he has never heard of NGM Planet. None of us are benefiting from your use of our content. As it now stands, your trackback at Between Two Worlds is depriving me of considerable traffic. The links you provide are inconspicuous and unnecessary to the reader. Each post is, to all appearances, original to your site.

De-linking me from your aggregator is not enough. Nothing short of a public statement giving credit where credit is due, and a cessation of current practices, will do. If you are, indeed, a follower of Christ, you will take this bit of correction and mend your ways.

David Kjos

Following that, wondering who this “Warren Myers” was, I investigated his personal blog. Searches for words like Jesus, gospel, grace, faith, and scripture produced little to indicate even a nominal religion, so maybe I was presumptuous in appealing to his conscience. Time passed, and I found myself happily de-linked from his aggregator. I expected no further communication, which was fine with me. But what followed later was not fine.

Mr Kjol,

The trackback you reference should not be pointing to ngmen.net - it should be going directly to "The Thirsty Theologian". I am unaware as to why it would show our aggregator rather than the original site - I am investigating that behavior with other blogs we aggregate to see if it does that with them as well. It should not, as you point out. (If you did click that link however, you would see that the "Next" and "Previous" links go straight to you, as it is merely importing data from the RSS feed made publicly-available from your blog. I presume you will also ask that people who follow your blog via RSS will cease, as that is also depriving you of traffic.)

We do have public statements indicating we do not write anything, but rather aggregate from other places. Kindly note the top of the page that reads "Christian blogs of interest" and, as already pointed-out in my previous email, our "About" page: http://ngmen.net/?page_id=2 -

"Welcome to NGM Planet, a service of ngmen.net.

This is an aggregation point for a variety of Christian blogs we’ve found to be of interest. If you would like you blog to be considered, please email the site admin at ngmen[at]ngmen[dot]net with your site’s name, your name, and we’ll review it.

Thanks for stopping by!

-the ngm team"

We are an aggregation point and nothing more. I am sorry this has upset you, as certainly that is not our goal.

I will have your syndication removed from our site shortly, and will no longer link others to it. There is nothing on our site which makes it look like we have written everything - if for no other reason than the volume per day of newly-syndicated entries going back to the original posters, along with, of course, the linked authors for each post and the RSS feed linking back to the original sites as well.

Again, I am sorry you are upset we are aggregating from your site. Have a good day.

Regards,
-Warren Myers

I can tolerate stupidity and, in its place, ignorance. But the intentionally obtuse are beyond excuse. At this point, I stop arguing. Psychoquacks call that passive-aggressive (a nonsensical term if ever there was one); I call it recognizing the difference between conversing with a human being and a brick wall. Of course I will not “also ask that people who follow [my] blog via RSS will cease.” They intentionally subscribed to my feed, and know who I am. The readers of NGM Planet may or may not. I say, most likely they do not; the previously-stated fact that I have received no resulting traffic ought to be proof enough of that.

I began the day without any assumption of unethical motives. Now, I am not so sure. I can’t imagine that the few ads on the aggregator site yield enough to make that the purpose of the site, but who knows? Or maybe he really just wants to share content he likes, but is too lazy or uncaring to do it right. Either way, it’s got to stop.

As I told Mr. Myers at the outset, if he wanted to post short excerpts with proper, conspicuous, credit and links to the source, that would be fine. We all do that; in fact, we hope others will do that for us. But to lift whole posts, removing the need to visit the source, and leaving it unlikely that anyone would ever be aware of the source, is theft. And to stubbornly continue when you are offered an ethical alternative exposes a willful disregard for anything but your own will. Don’t be that way; don’t do that. And if you do, don’t pretend to be a disciple of Christ.

Other “contributors” to NGM Planet are:

• 10 Million Words
• 20 Times Around the Block
• adrianwarnock.com
• AlbertMohler.com – Blog
• ali’s african adventures
• Answers in Genesis Articles
• antipaucity
• Atheist Central — Ray Comfort’s Blog
• Blog entries
• Capitol Hill Baptist Church
• Cerulean Sanctum
• Challies Dot Com – Informing the Reforming
• Church Matters: The 9Marks Blog
• Desiring God Blog
• ESV Bible Blog
• Eternal Perspectives (Randy Alcorn’s blog)
• Feed Your Faith
• GalatiansC4V16
• Grace to You Blog
• Grace to You: Drawing Near Daily Devotional
• Head Heart Hand
• J. Mark Fox’s Blog
• Journey Deeper Into God’s Word
• kerux noemata
• Ligonier Ministries Blog
• Next Gen Men
• Parchment and Pen
• Practical Shepherding
• Pyromaniacs
• Reformation21 Blog
• Samaritan’sPurse.tv – Featured
• Shepherds’ Pie
• Take Your Vitamin Z
• The Blazing Center
• The Fishermen
• The Gospel Coalition Blog
• The Walker Report
• Together for the Gospel (T4G)
• Toronto Pastors Fellowship
• Veritas Aequitas
• Wrestling with an Angel

Because I’m so busy . . .

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time for the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 7” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (May 14), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday. There are still several copies remaining, so if you haven’t won, keep trying.

I would normally be posting something from John Calvin on the Gospel of John from John Calvin, but I was irresistibly drawn to do other things. I intend to persevere until I am finished. I don’t even have time to figure out how to fit the whole tulip into this lame excuse. See you tomorrow, unless I’m otherwise predestined.

Earlier this week, when my wife answered my “What’s for supper?” with “Asian meatballs,” I couldn’t help think of the recent cookbook goof calling for “salt and freshly ground black people.” [sigh . . .] I’ll never think of Italian sausage and Swedish meatballs the same. Anyway . . .

It’s time for another Holiness of God drawing.

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time for the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 6” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (May 7), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday (and the next, until I run out), so there will be multiple chances to win.

Freedom Friday is on hiatus until I come across something that inspires me or puts a burr under my saddle in that area.

I have recently made a few comments about people who pay to read blogs, this one in particular, that are available free of charge. In spite of my insinuation that it is silly to do so, I realize that convenience and other factors of which I am ignorant might make it desirable to pay 99¢.month to read via Kindle. The question behind my raised eyebrow was not so much “why pay to read a blog?” as “why pay to read this blog?” So you Kindle readers can relax and stop emailing me (about this); I don’t really think you’re foolish.

Anyway, I recently exchanged a few words with a friend on things related, including “tip jars,” i.e. PayPal buttons by which readers may make donations. Now, I want to state one thing loud and clear; it’s important, so pay attention: I have no intention of setting that up here. I am not now putting out feelers in advance of such an enterprise. However, I am curious. If I did do that, would you

1. ignore it,
2. leave a token pittance and forget it thereafter,
3. donate regularly (or at least semi-regularly),
4. or give me a piece of your mind?

Please be brutally honest. My answer, if I was in your shoes, would be a, and that is no faux humility. What I’m really trying to learn by this is not whether or not I could make any money, nor am I fishing for compliments. I really just want to know if I’m right about what I think your answer will be.

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time for the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, Kindle, link from your blog, bookmark, etc.
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 5” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (April 30), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday (and the next, until I run out), so there will be multiple chances to win.

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or Kindle
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 4” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (April 23), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday (and the next, and the next . . .), so there will be multiple chances to win.

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or Kindle
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 3” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (April 16), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday (and the next, and the next . . .), so there will be multiple chances to win.

I want to thank those who offered prayers on our behalf in the last few days. We are back home safe and sound from a trip that went fairly well, all things considered. God continues to perform above my expectations.

I should be getting back to my Gospel of John commentary reading program today, but we’re trying to get our ducks in a row so we can hit the road to Louisville, Kentucky on Sunday for the 2010 Together for the Gospel Conference. So I might as well face it: I’m not going to get much meaningful reading or blogging done between now and then.

I do intend to blog from Louisville, but I don’t yet know what that will look like. It won’t be anything like live-blogging à la Challies. I’m sure it will be something very new and exciting. Or not. Try not to fall off the edge of your seats in anticipation.

Free RC!

Last week’s winner has been drawn and notified, and now it’s time the next round. The rules are the same as last week. To win a copy of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, just send me an email that includes

• Your name
• How you follow this blog, i.e. RSS, Twitter, or Facebook
• “The Holiness of God Giveaway 2” in the subject line

Entries will be accepted through next Friday (April 9), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday (and the next, and the next . . .), so there will be multiple chances to win.

Our regularly scheduled posts will be at least partially suspended for the next few days. We’ve had a death in our extended family, and will most likely be traveling to a funeral in Wisconsin on Monday. I will still be announcing another The Holiness of God drawing tomorrow, but I will most likely not be updating Twitter or Facebook until things get back to normal next week.

There are some unusually difficult circumstances involved in this situation, so your prayers are appreciated.

If you missed reading this on April 1, this is what you would have seen.

My biannual facelift wasn’t scheduled until June, but with Spring in the air, I’m in the mood for something fresh right now.

This upgrade is more than just a new look. It represents a whole new mindset, one that is more positive, upbeat, and optimistic. I’m sure I’ve benefited in some ways from the reading I’ve done to bring you the content to which you’ve become accustomed, but really, enough is enough. Those old, dead theologians were good, as are the living who follow in their footsteps, but there comes a time to move on and embrace the present, with a cheerful eye to the future.

So I’m leaving the past behind, and beginning a new journey. My traveling companions will be today’s prophets of hope. In the coming months, if you join me, we’ll be soaking up the optimistic wisdom of great contemporary thinkers like Joyce Meyer, Creflo Dollar, and Joel Osteen.

I look forward to embarking on this new adventure, and sharing new insights with you daily. Will you join me?

Free RC!

I have recently come into possession of several copies of The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul, which I will be giving away over the next several weeks. Winners will be chosen by lottery, and all you need do to enter is send me an email that includes your name and — here is the catch — that you follow this blog by one of three methods: RSS, Twitter, or Facebook. (If you’re tempted to lie about it to win a copy, I won’t be checking up on you, but perhaps you should read this excerpt before entering.) Just make sure the subject of your email says “The Holiness of God Giveaway 1.” Entries will be accepted through next Friday (April 2), and the winner will be notified by email. Another giveaway will be announced next Saturday (and the next, and the next . . .), so there will be multiple chances to win.

1. You must include your subscription information, i.e. RSS, Twitter, or Facebook.
2. If the subject line of your email does not say “The Holiness of God Giveaway 1,” I might miss it and it might not find its way into the drawing.

It’s official: I am an idiot. As you may know, I joined Facebook yesterday. You can read my thoughts and intents on that here. As it turns out, I didn’t know what I was doing.

I knew what I wanted. I just wanted a Facebook presence that would feed this blog. I didn’t want to go through all that phony phriend nonsense, so I declared right from the start that I wasn’t going to do that. Then, after setting up my page and seeing how things worked, I realized that, even though it was open to everyone, only “friends” could get my notifications. I therefore relented and began accepting “friends.” Then, a reader advised me that a “fan page” might suit me better. I looked into that and discovered that he was right; that was exactly what I wanted, so I set up a page for The Thirsty Theologian. It was perfect . . .

Except for one thing. See, when you create a fan page, you have to put it in a category according to its purpose. Looking over the available categories, the one that seemed to fit closest was “writer.” It was either that, or “religious organization.” Anyway, I thought, “blogger/writer, close enough.” But then, in the search results, I saw that I was listed as an author. “Writer” can mean a lot of things, but “author” implies legitimate published work. I’m no author, and I was embarrassed to have anyone catch me misrepresenting myself. Having already acquired a few “fans,” and having already apologized to my “friends” for dumping them in favor of a fan page, I looked for a way to change the category to anything that wouldn’t be a bald-faced lie, but to no avail. Someone will probably now inform me of an easy, obvious way to do that, but I couldn’t find it. In the process, I discovered the category I had overlooked: “website.” Duh. I decided I had to start over, but it was late, so I simply deactivated my account to avoid accumulating any more fans, and went to bed.

This morning (which, to my frustration, came at 3:15), I wiped the slate clean and started over. This time, I can say with a reasonable measure of confidence that I am finished, and that you can find my new Facebook page here.

Again, I want to apologize to everyone who paid me the compliment of becoming my “friend” or “fan,” and hope you will give me a chance to redeem myself.

Finally, I’m still uncomfortable with the idea of having “fans.” If there was a way to avoid it, I would, so please, if you know how that can be done, and it involves redoing anything, keep it to yourself.

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. —Inigo Montoya

You already know what I think of Twitter. I’ve already insulted a multitude of “tweeters” on that score. Yet I opened a Twitter account more than six months ago, and continue posting there for the reason given at the time. I consider myself a missionary to the grammatically impaired.

Well, today I’m here to tell you that slippery slopes really do exist, and one sin does lead to another. The proof? I joined Facebook yesterday. Now, I’m not going to beat around the bush: my opinion of Facebook is several fathoms below my opinion of Twitter. Twitter, as most people use it, is shallow, narcissistic, pointless, and generally lame. What Twitter does to communication, Facebook does to human relationships — and I despise that.

I actually had a much longer diatribe on Facebook prepared, but I think I’ll save it. Suffice it to say that everything I said about my use of Twitter will apply to Facebook as well, which means I probably won’t “friend” you*. Don’t take it personally, and don’t get me started about the abominable perversion of a word I hold precious. If you really are, or want to be, my friend, drop me an email, write me a letter, give me a call, stop by for a visit — you know, like a friend would.

I don’t know how profitable this venture will be. Honestly, the best way to follow this, or any other, blog is through an RSS reader. If you already do that, there is no reason to follow me on Twitter or Facebook. However, if this sort of thing interests you, I’ll tell you what you can expect from me on Facebook. First, links to this blog’s daily posts. Second, next to nothing. I spent quite a bit of time yesterday going through all the privacy settings, basically fixing it so no one can see anything but my posts, which, if I did it right, everyone can see, so you won’t have to be my “friend” to get everything I’ve made available to anyone.

So — for whatever it’s worth, here I am on Facebook.

*Update: Okay, so what do I know? It seems you can’t conveniently follow my Facebook posts unless you are my “friend,” so I guess I’ll have to loosen up on that. But I don’t like it!

*Update 2: A kind reader informed your clueless host that a Thirsty Theologian Fan Page would likely serve him better and solve the “friend” dilemma. That advice has been gratefully accepted, and the link above has been appropriately modified. He asks you to accept his apologies for the inconvenience, especially to those of you who so eagerly clicked the “friend” button.

*Update 3: I’m not feeling too bright presently. For now I’ll just say I goofed, and consequently, I’ve deactivated my Facebook account. I’ll explain later, and have it all straightened out soon. But now, I’m going to bed.

*Update 4: The Rest of the Story.

Humble man that I am, I have my spam filter set to keep out any comments that might tend to puff me up. The following are examples:

“Very interesting tale”

“Best Site Good Work”

“perfect design thanks”

“Cool site good luck”

“good material thanks”

“very best job”

“Excellent work, Nice Design”

“I'm happy very good site”

“this post is fantastic”

You can see why I want to avoid all that flattery. Still, I’d like to thank all the kind readers who left those encouraging comments. Thanks also for the many links you provided. I don’t have time to check them out, but I’m sure they are all very useful.

   In case you didn’t get this — and if you’re not a blogger,
   you probably won’t — this is completely sarcastic.

I realized late last night that, having completed Disputations on the Holy Scriptures last week, I had no post ready for today.

Wednesday has been bibliology day here since July last year. Since then I’ve read Translating Truth by Leland Ryken (ed.), The Canon of Scripture by F. F. Bruce, How to Read the Bible as Literature by Leland Ryken, Scripture Alone by R. C. Sproul, and now Disputations on the Holy Scriptures by William Whitaker. I’ll admit it: Disputations was a heavy volume, not just in its 718-page bulk, but in its content. Perhaps it was an ill-conceived idea to read it alongside Charnock’s The Existence and Attributes of God. I’m tired. I won’t be picking up anything too heavy for a while (did I mention I’m also presently reading The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, 1245 pages, small print?).

Eventually, I’m sure, I’ll want to pick up another book on The Book. Any suggestions?

Considering yesterday’s topic, I suppose that might not be the best title. It’s just that I feel somewhat compromised today.

I’ve made no secret of the fact that I don’t think much of Twitter. I love brevity, but let’s not get stupid about it. Nevertheless, I have created a Twitter page. It’s only an experiment in blog promotion; we’ll see what it’s worth.

On my Twitter page you will not find:

• What I am eating.
• What I am drinking.
• What I am wearing.
• Where I am.
• Where I am going.
• Where I have been.
• What I am doing.
• What I just did.
• What I am about to do.
• How I am feeling.
• What I am thinking.
• [Fill in your own narcissistic category]
• Truncated words and sentences. Every sentence will have a correctly-spelled subject and verb, correctly punctuated and capitalized, guaranteed, or your money back (blog post titles not included).

The only item on the list above with any value (and that tenuous) is “what I’m thinking”; but any thought I can complete in 140 characters is not worth reading — not alone, anyway. That goes for you, too, by the way, even if your name is Mohler or Piper (I did get a kick out of fakejohnpiper, though).

I surfed around twitter a bit, looking for something redeeming. I expected hoped for some dignified Presbyterian profundity at Ligon Duncan’s page (I enjoyed him immensely at Together for the Gospel 2008, and expect to again in 2010). Nope. From there I clicked Phil Johnson’s rather juvenile-looking avatar. Now, I’m not a Phil Johnson fan-boy, but I can say I liked him even before he was blogging. I had listened to his sermons, visited his Spurgeon Archive, Hall of Church History, and Bookmarks, and of course, benefited from his work at Grace to You. So I clicked into his Twitter page with expectations a bit high, perhaps. Well . . . I never would have anticipated using this word in relation to Phil, but here it is:  b o r i n g.  Phil shouldn’t take it personally, though. Everyone is boring on Twitter, even my friends Tim and Daniel. (Tim and Daniel were my first two followers, until they read this post. They only followed me because I followed them first, anyway.*) It’s not like I’m any better; if I did like everyone else, I could out-boring Al Gore tweeting his backyard thermometer fluctuations on the hour, every hour.

I won’t be doing that. My page will look like John Macarthur’s (and who could be better to emulate?) most of the time. The rub is that I’m already subscribed to the Grace to You feed, so I have no need to follow him on Twitter. The same will be true here, if you already subscribe to this blog’s feed. So this will serve as just another feed to this blog, for the Twitter crowd. “The Thirsty Theologian: Going into the Highways and Byways . . .” I may occasionally rarely throw in a personal news item, but I will try to keep those in line with “soup questions.”†

So off I go, on a most likely useless experiment. Follow me here. Or don’t.

* If you choose to follow me, don’t get your feelings hurt if I don’t reciprocate. I don’t intend to actually follow anyone, including these guys. I do follow their blogs — you know, where they can actually say something. Maybe I’ll follow yours, too. Update: Now, this one, I will follow, at least until it gets boring.

† see Finding Forrester.

Happy blogiversary to me . . .

Blogiversary is not really a word. I don’t really like the word blog, either, but there they are, proof that the internet is destroying the English language, and possibly the Canadian one, too. Anyway . . . yesterday marked the end of the 4th year, and the 365th consecutive day, of blogging here at the Thirsty Theologian. I was going to skip today and make a clean break at one year, but believe it or not, my wife said I shouldn’t. So if this turns into an addiction à la Challies, it’s her fault.

To celebrate, I’m rolling out my biennial blog facelift, which isn’t even a real redesign this time, but little more than a new color scheme — without color — demonstrating just how set in my ways I am. I don’t really change as I get older, I just see things more in black and white.

I know what you’re thinking. Because two other guys are already using Curmudgeon in their blog title, that’s why.

Sorry, no real blogging going on here today. I just have one announcement. June 1st will mark two milestones for the Thirsty Theologian this year. It will mark the 4th anniversary of the blog, and the end of one year of daily blogging. I’m only making note of this today because that will also be time for my biennial facelift, and I’ve decided to go ahead with one of my planned changes today.

I’m doing away with the On the Web blog that you’ve seen in the sidebar, and replacing it with a bit of javascript that will bring you my “shared items” from my Google Reader. What that will mean to you is a simpler format, no excerpts or commentary from me, and no way for you to comment. The latter will make little difference, since few of you used that feature anyway. It will also mean that links will be limited to whatever comes through the RSS feeds I subscribe to. Speaking of RSS, those of you who have subscribed to On the Web through an RSS reader will want to subscribe to the new feed here (this will only effect On the Web subscribers. The Thirsty Theologian feed will remain the same). What this will mean to me is one-click linking, which means lots of time saved. I wish I had thought of this four years ago!

Now that I’ve mentioned the upcoming facelift, don’t get too excited (yes, I heard your heart-rates increase). The new look will be dramatically different while remaining almost entirely the same. Now might be a good time to tell me what you don’t like about the current design. Maybe I’ll take your complaints into consideration. Or maybe not. It’s not like I get paid to do this, after all.

I also doubt I’ll continue the daily blogging regimen after day 365. We shall see.

THANKS to everyone who contributed their captions. After much deliberation, a winner was chosen late last night. The winner is J. Eric Lewis, whose winning caption can be found where captions belong, directly below the picture. Eric, if you will email me your mailing address, I‘ll get the book out to you pronto.

I’ve got a stack of books I’ve been meaning to give away, but I keep forgetting to remember to not forget to do it; so today I’m giving one away. I’ve been trying, without much success, to think of creative and fun ways to select winners. I don’t know how well today’s contest qualifies in that way, but in the end, someone will get a book.

Here’s what you do: caption the following handsome image of yours truly. A panel of unbiased judges (seriously — not just me) will choose their favorite caption. The winner gets a book. And that book is The Truth of the Cross by R. C. Sproul. I’ll leave it open for a week, and update this post next Monday with the winner.

So here you go — caption me.

The winning caption:
“Good. Now, where is that bowl and those fiddlers?”
(I don‘t get it)

Mrs Thirsty Theologian’s entry:
Aren’t I pretentious?

As this is Monday, the day on which I endeavor to have something original to say for myself, I am here to say something original. Now, what shall I say? How about I mark the new year (right on time, as usual) with . . . a list! Lists! Yes, lists are a great way to start the year. Here are a few.

Books completed in 2008

• John MacArthur, The Truth War
• John Calvin, Sermons on the Beatitudes
• Richard Phillips, Jesus the Evangelist
• John Grisham, The Innocent Man — Non-fiction, and a very sad story.
• Joel Beeke, Heirs with Christ — This is an excellent, easy-to-read treatment of a neglected doctrine.
• Paul Williams, If You Could Ask God One Question — This is a good little book covering some basic theological questions. My only criticism is that it is written at such a low level that the average reader might feel a bit insulted. Set your vanity aside before reading this otherwise useful book.
• Mark Dever, What Is a Healthy Church — Distribute this little book in your church as a vaccination against Hybels-Warren Syndrome.
• Bonar/Haykin/Brooker, Christ Is All: The Piety of Horatius Bonar — I loved this book! Read it straight through in an afternoon, or use it as a daily devotional. (The same recommendation goes for this companion volume, Devoted to the Service of the Temple: Piety, Persecution, and Ministry in the Writings of Hercules Collins.)
• David McCullough, 1776
• Sinclair Ferguson, In Christ Alone
• Stephen King, Cell — Yes, I read an occasional creepy novel.
• Grudem/Ryken/Collins/Poythress/Winter, Translating Truth — Read this book, toss your NIV.
• C. John Miller, A Faith Worth Sharing — This is an excellent, practical book on personal evangelism, and a quick, easy read to boot.
• David McCullough, John Adams — John Adams is my favorite founding father. He would not like what we’ve done with the republic he loved.
• R. C. Sproul, The Truth of the Cross — A great little primer on the atonement.
• Scott Smith, A Simple Plan — Published in 1994, this is not a new book. However, if you haven’t read it, and you like an occasional novel, I highly recommend this one. This is a parable, however unintended, of the doctrine of total depravity. Never has a secular novelist captured so well the potential of the sin that dwells within “good” men. This is fiction that could easily be true.
• Joseph J. Ellis, His Excellency
• Daniel DeFoe, Robinson Crusoe — Okay, I’ll admit that I didn’t finish this one. I had read it as a kid, but this time it just didn’t seem as exciting. Once he got off the island, I lost interest. I had forgotten that the story goes on after that. Still, this is a good story of God’s sovereignty, and one that ought to be read once, at least.

Books began in 2008 (that were abandoned but will be completed eventually)

• Dever/Duncan/Mahaney/Mohler, Preaching the Cross — These are the conference sessions from Together for the Gospel 2006. I have watched them on DVD, so I have sort of finished this one. (You can download the mp3s here. Scroll down for 2006.)
• William Wilberforce, A Practical View of Christianity
• Harold Greenlee, Introduction to Textual Criticism
• Mark Dever, The Message of the Old Testament: Promises Made — A brief scan of this book, as well as its companion volume The Message of the New Testament: Promises Kept tells me that these are must-reads, and I seldom say that.

Books began in 2008 (that I am presently reading)

• J. I. Packer, Knowing God (blogged on Tuesdays) — I’ve never read this before, and I’m glad I finally am.
• F. F. Bruce, The Canon of Scripture (blogged on Wednesdays)
• Iain Murray, A Scottish Christian Heritage (blogged on Thursdays) — If I was stranded on a desert island with one author, I would choose Iain Murray. Then I would just sit there entranced while he rambled on.
• John Piper, God Is the Gospel (blogged on Fridays) — If you read only one book by John Piper, read this one. If you read only one gospel-related book this year, read this one.
• David Wells, The Courage to Be Protestant (blogged on Saturdays) — In a day when relevance is supposedly of premium value, this book ought to be read by every Christian. It is relevant in the truest sense of the word, and will be for quite some time to come.
• Stephen Ambrose, D-Day June 6, 1944: The Climactic Battle of World War II — “Fascinating” is an overused adjective these days, but I’ll use it here: fascinating!

Some plans for 2009

• Tentative blogging schedule:
  • Tuesdays: Follow Knowing God with The Holiness of God by R. C. Sproul.
  • Wednesdays: Follow The Canon of Scripture with How to Read the Bible as Literature by Leland Ryken.
  • Thursdays: Follow A Scottish Christian Heritage with The Faithful Preacher: Recapturing the Vision of Three Pioneering African-American Pastors by Thabiti Anyabwile.
  • Fridays: Follow God Is the Gospel with [?]
  • Saturdays: Follow The Courage to Be Protestant with [?]
  • Sundays: Finish blogging the Psalms in the Geneva Bible (Psalm 119 will be split up over the next several weeks) and begin blogging the Gospel of John (switching to the NASB), accompanied by J. C. Ryle’s Expository Thoughts on the Gospels.
  • Mondays: Try to have something more clever to say than usual. Someone who shall remain nameless because marriage is difficult enough without dragging your dirty laundry out and blogging about it says I tend to be “dry.” I’m afraid this post is not contributing toward that end.
• Make more bulleted lists, and numbered lists whenever I can justify it.
• Meet last year’s goal (of which I fell woefully short) of averaging one book per week.
• Do more Bible study (vs. just reading).
• Read a lot of history, both church and world.
• Not go Calvin-crazy due to all the quincentenary exuberance all around the web. I will, however, be reading a Calvin biography and purchasing his commentaries and the Institutes, taking advantage of an excellent deal from Solid Ground Books.

As you can see, there are a couple of question marks in the future plans. That, as you may have surmised, is because I don’t know what I will do in those instances. I hope you can tolerate the suspense.

I was checking my stats last night, wondering if anyone is coming here when they should be spending time with their families, and I was truly surprised at the amount of traffic that continues to flow through. Shame on all of you. As long as you're here, though, I'll give you something to read, and you will see that it was like so totally not worth it to come here.

These are some of the google searches that have led poor, lost souls to this site lately. These aren't even as interesting as they sometimes are.

dumb theology — What can I say?

stan and doug christmas songs — They're here.

why is rick warren overweight — Now, be nice. Everyone looks fat in a Hawaiian shirt.

Well, maybe not everyone.

These are just a few links to what I have done in past years.

2005
Lord’s Day 51, 2005
Christmas Eve
Lord’s Day 52, 2005

2006
We Don’t Even Have a Chimney
Lord’s Day 52, 2006
Saturday Stupidity: Christmas 2006

2007
Have Yourself a Mercenary Christmas
Infiltrated!

And better yet , a few things others have done this year:
Natural Law on Christmas Eve
What Christmas Is All About
The Christmas Story
Could Mary have said “no”?
The Death of Santa
Did the Magi Follow an Angel?
Is the Celebration of Christmas a Pagan Ritual?
Merry Christmas
Bad News: Santa Claus Is Coming to Town
Gloria, in Excelsis Deo (sung by, I believe, an eskimo choir)

Last Monday, I wrote a little about my intentions for the future of this blog. You offered some suggestions in the comments and via email, which I have considered, and I have decided on a schedule that I hope to stick to, more or less, for as long as it works. (How’s that for commitment?)

For a while now, I have been reserving Mondays for posting my own thoughts on whatever has been on my mind, or blog notes (such as this post). That will continue. I may take up the challenge to write a series on “How to Be a Christian.” Hopefully, I can come up with a less scary title.

Tuesday will be for Theology Proper, continuing with Knowing God for now.

Wednesday, I’ll tackle Bibliology, beginning, I think, with The Canon of Scripture by F. F. Bruce.

Thursday will Church History Day. I’ve got a couple church history sets I’d like to get into, as well as a few biographies and Iain Murray titles lined up, so we’ll have no shortage of material there.

Following the suggestion of “Good Fridays,” I’m going to dedicate Fridays to Gospel-centered material. Now, at least, I know what soteriology is.

Saturdays have been mostly frivolous to this point, and probably will still be at times, but I hope to give Saturdays to a mixture of other topics, such as current issues, and Church and Christian life.

Thanks for your input. It is, as always, welcome and appreciated. Now, I’ve got some reading to do.

As regular readers may easily observe, this blog has become little more than a journal of “What I’m Reading Now.” I don’t really know why I started blogging, but it has become for me a stimulus to thought, and for the last six months, as I’ve posted every day, a means of disciplining myself to continue regular reading. I think this is a good purpose, and one I’d like to refine a bit.

Rather than simply rambling through one book after another, with no apparent rhyme or reason, I’m thinking of devoting each weekday to a theme. For example, I have several books I want to read on such subjects as the Canon of Scripture, textual criticism, hermeneutics, etc, so one day could be devoted to Bibliology. Church history could be one, and current issues another (for example, I still need to finish The Courage to be Protestant).

This is where you, gentle reader, come in. I will entertain your suggestions of possible categories or themes. What topics interest you? Leave your suggestions in the comments or email me here. Your input is appreciated.

Matt Gumm has condescended to enlighten us to how he writes, and has asked us to reciprocate. These are the questions he asks, and, for what they’re worth, my answers:

1. What blogging tools do you use?
   
   I type anything of any length in Word, because I’m fussy about stuff like smart quotes, and Word is the most convenient way to get that formatting. If I want to save a document to somewhere other than the blog, I use Google Docs. That way, I can access it from any computer. I don’t use Google Docs to edit html (though that would be very easy and convenient), because it adds a bunch of it’s own code that means nothing to me, and I must micromanage every jot and tittle. Anyway, the special formatting I do is easy enough to type in myself, or add in the blog editor (Movable Type).
   
   
2. How do you post?
   
   After #1 above, I select “Published” and click “Save.” Duh.
   
   
3. How do you get your ideas?
   
   Sporadically. Most of my posts are just bits of “what I’m reading.” Whenever I have an original thought(!), I write about it. Most of these are discarded as lame or useless. Sometimes, like now, I write in reaction to someone else; but I generally avoid doing so.
   
   
4. Who is your target audience?
   
   Me. That is, everything I post is the product of whatever I’ve taken in for my own benefit. I just post whatever is on my mind (see #3), and hope others will be edified thereby. Just lately I’ve begun using the blog as a discipline, à la Challies. I’ve blogged every day since June 1st. Forcing myself to put something out each day requires me to put something in first.
   
   
5. What do you hope to say or accomplish with your blog?
   
   Good question. I’m not really sure why I started blogging. I love to read, and I’m happy to take in all that I can even if I’m the only one who benefits from it; but if I can pass it along to others, that’s even better. If I have one goal, it might be that I’d like to be one small voice, tugging Christians away from all that is new, and back to the ancient truths of the Christian faith. Rather grandiose, I suppose, but I that’s my burden.

Watch this video of James White refuting Norman Geisler, especially if you are an Arminian (or one of those mythical “neither Calvinist nor Arminian” creatures). The first person to point out the glaring inconsistency — on Dr. White’s part, not Geisler’s — will receive a free copy of The Potter’s Freedom, compliments of the Thirsty Theologian.

As you may know, my wife and I attended the 2008 Together for the Gospel Conference. You may also know that they sent each of us home with a load of excellent books. That means that we came home with two of everything. Rather than drawing a name, as I have in the past, I’ve been trying to think of clever ways to give them away. A couple of weeks ago, I gave one to a reader who posted a comment that caught my attention. This time, I’m going to post a quote, and send a prize to the first two commenters who identify the writer.

What is the prize? Choose one book from the list below:

• Christ is All: The Piety of Horatius Bonar ed. by Michael Haykin and Darrin Brooker
• The Mortification of Sin by John Owen (Puritan Paperbacks, Abridged)
• Walking as He Walked by Joel Beeke
• reThink by Steve Wright
• Young, Restless, Reformed by Collin Hansen
• The Faithful Preacher by Thabiti Anyabwile
• In My Place Condemned He Stood by J. I. Packer and Mark Dever
• The Future of Justification by John Piper
• Pierced for Our Transgressions by Steve Jeffery, Michael Ovey, and Andrew Sach

Because I’m offering two prizes, you will have to email your answer to me here. Make sure the subject line says “Book Give-away III.” I’m closing the comments on this post until the winners are identified. Also, if I saw you at Together for the Gospel, consider yourself disqualified!

Now, name this writer:

Next to the perusal of the Scriptures, which I earnestly inculcate, I exhort my pupils to peruse Calvin’s commentaries, which I extol in loftier terms than Helmich himself; for I affirm that he excels beyond comparison in the interpretation of Scripture, and that his commentaries ought to be more highly valued than all that is handed down to us by the Library of the Fathers; so that I acknowledge him to have possessed above most others, or rather above all other men, what may be called an eminent gift of prophecy.

I will update this post as soon as we have a winner, so check back here for that announcement.

Update: I have two winners:

1. A. Jones
2. Lisa Bailes

Congratulations, and thanks for playing. Just email me once more with your mailing address and book choice, and I‘ll send them right out. (If you are the number 2 winner, include a second choice in case you both choose the same book.)

Sorry, all you who guessed Spurgeon (and there were many). The Author was Arminius.

Numbers — we all say we don’t care about them, some of us really mean it, but most, I think, can’t resist checking them from time to time. The numbers, we might think, tell us if we are as brilliant, profound, insightful, witty, and most of all, popular as we hope we are. The numbers I refer to are, of course, blog statistics. Our stats tell us, “Wow, people actually read my stuff!” or, that hardly anyone does.

Stats can either build our egos, or crush them. Most of us, no matter how small our numbers, can probably find some cause for pride in our stats. I recently did a little analysis to see what the numbers mean. I’m not sure I got it right, but if I did, my conclusion is that I have far less to be proud of than a superficial reading of the numbers indicates. Sure, I have x page loads, y unique visitors, and z returning visitors; but z is the only number that really means “I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!” And that number is considerably smaller than x. So, here are my stats, in percent rather than numbers to avoid [ahem] boasting.

71% of you stay for less than 5 seconds. By “you,” of course, I mean “them,” because if you’re reading this, you’re not one of “them.” These are probably the folks who came here by way of a Google search for “asparagus and a theologian” and ended up here.

2% of you are also probably not reading this. You (they) check out in 30 seconds or less.

The remaining 27% of you are actually reading something. 10% stay for at least 30 seconds, but less than 5 minutes. That may not sound like much, but you can actually read quite a bit in 30 seconds. 4 minutes and 59 seconds is far more than I spend on almost any blog I read.

17% stick around a while and probably deserve some kind of award. 6% are here for 5 minutes to an hour (1% for 20 minutes or more). An amazing 11% stay for an hour or more. An hour? Here? These readers are most likely incarcerated somewhere, or they are Norwegian*, but not both; Norwegians never get incarcerated.

So, looking more closely at my stats was a rather humbling experience. But I’ve saved the worst for last: of the 573 posts on this site, the most popular is a guest post by an eighteen-year-old girl†. It’s a good thing I don’t care about the numbers.   . . . and [David] went and hanged himself.

These are just a few bloggy notes.

1. Blogging will probably be as thin as usual this week, and next week there will be none at all*, not even linkage. The reason for this, as you may know, is that I will be traveling to Louisville KY for the 2008 Together for the Gospel Conference.
   • Please pray for all those who will be traveling†, for the speakers, and for all those involved in the considerable task of organizing and making it happen.
   • Pray that there will be no strife, particularly between me and this guy who called me weird, and this other guy who, on at least two occasions, hurt my feeling severely by resorting to cruel name-calling. I‘m still bitter.
2. While I‘m away, listen to these sermons:
   • Jonathan Moorhead‘s sermon on 2 Timothy 2:1-6, A Biblical Philosophy of Missions.
   • Daniel‘s sermon on Hebrews 12:1 (Part 1, Part 2). Turn the volume up. The audio is poor, but the preaching is excellent.
   There will be a test.
3. I‘ve added a couple of categories to the sidebar, Shop here & Buy these. As noted at the bottom, any link marked with an asterisk is one that,if you use it, will send a few cents my way. I know such crass commercialization will offend some, but I have no apologies. First, I have never made any serious effort to make money off of this site, and I‘m not starting now. I‘m not linking to anything that I don‘t whole-heartedly endorse (with the exception of the Amazon search box, of course). Second, if I was aggressively trying to produce revenue, I still would have no apologies. I am a committed capitalist, and do not hesitate for one moment to say that Jesus is, too. So use the links or don‘t, just don‘t bother me with your objections.‡
4. I might get another Calvinism post out before I go, or I might not.

Updated

Don't expect to see much action here for a while. I've come down with a nasty bug that isn't quite threatening to kill me, but it's making me wish it would. I won't be posting the next Calvinism article until I can breathe again (I think it's influenza). I'll be back as soon as I can, unless this does kill me. Then, I guess I won't dfbvgbgfrbnmhgm, nbmhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Dear fdsfds,

Sometime after midnight on Sunday, February 17th — or 10:00 PM on Saturday where you are in the vicinity of Astoria, Oregon — you ran a Google search for “thirstytheologian.” At 12:43:57, you entered my site, spent 34 minutes and 19 seconds here, and left without commenting. Then you went to another blog and left an obscene and particularly juvenile comment.

I don’t know if you’ll ever come back here. I don’t know why you would, if you really think I “[obscene verb] [direct object].” But you did come intentionally looking for me, so maybe you will.

What were you thinking? That it would bother me that someone out there doesn’t like me? That you used childish, obscene language against me? Am I supposed to be offended? Angry? What?

I’ll tell you what I do feel. I feel sorry that you have not matured beyond playground insults. I feel sorry that you can’t express yourself as an intelligent adult. I feel sorry that you don’t have the courage to address me directly, which you could certainly do. I feel sorry that you are so threatened by something I have written that you feel the need to strike back.

Most of all, though, I am sorry that you don’t know, as I do, the forgiveness of sins that you can have through faith in Jesus Christ. You see, I’m not angry with you, because I was born in the same sinful condition as you. I’ve done and said far worse things than you wrote in your little comment. I deserve the eternal condemnation of God just as you do. But I have no fear of God’s wrath because Christ has taken my sin to the cross and borne it upon himself, and his perfect righteousness has been credited to me — which is good, because I had absolutely nothing to offer for myself, and no hope.

So rather than being angry with you, I pray that God will soften your heart, that you may humble yourself under his mighty hand, and trust in him for your eternal salvation. I pray that you will receive the same mercy and grace that I have. If you’d like to know more about salvation in Jesus Christ, feel free to email me (find the Contact link in the sidebar). I would welcome the opportunity to share my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, with you.

Sheepish Brian has tagged me with one of those meme things. I’m supposed to tell you “seven things about myself that you don’t know about me.” Number one would be that I absolutely cannot resist pointing out the lousy structure of that phrase, except that I think I’ve already mentioned my grammar correction compulsion. I really couldn’t think of anything interesting, so here are seven mundane things you probably don’t know about me.

1. I eat Cheetos with a fork.
2. I’ve attended Baptist worship services twice in my life. They were two different churches on consecutive Sundays while looking for a new church. I haven’t been in a Baptist church since.
3. My favorite chip & dip combination is Pringles Jalapeño with plain sour cream. You can‘t eat Pringles with a fork, or I would.
4. I write two or three articles for every original one I actually post. I abandon two or three for every one I finish. Some frequently-posting bloggers affirm my feeling that this is a good thing.
5. I don’t shave my legs. I don’t actually understand why anyone does.
6. I’ve been to both coasts and two Canadian provinces, but I’ve never been south of Waterloo, Iowa.
7. I’m more handsome than I appear.

There you go: seven things you probably didn’t know about me — like you care.

I've been working, little by little, on the new layout that I promised "soon" some time ago. Amateur that I am, I need to launch the home page to get a better idea of what I'm up to. So, if you're still out there, hang on. There may be some bumps ahead, and some features will be incomplete and others non-functioning. Firefox and Safari users will have the least trouble. Older versions of Internet Explorer will (I think) work better than IE 7.0. The trouble spots will be the nifty drop-down menus that I am just learning. At least I hope those are the only trouble spots. We'll see.

Addendum: You can help! Just tell me which of these fonts you are seeing in the header. Thank you very much.

On the odd chance that anyone has noticed, I have not been posting much in the last couple of weeks. I've been occupied with a few other things, one of which your tired eyes might appreciate. I'm working on a new template for the blog. I've gone through several ideas and discarded them, but I think I've settled on one that I will actually complete. It's going to be an entirely new theme, trimmed down and prettier. After 2½ years, it will be the first total makeover I've done. So look for The Thirsty Theologian 2.0, coming soon (soon being a relative term).

A comment apparently left by the Russian mafia:

If you want do delete your site from our spam bases - just email us with domain of your site:

abuse-here@inbox.ru

thank you!

I ain't no fool. I wasn't born yesterday. I also didn't just fall off the turnip truck. That happened years ago.

How many of you remember entering a book drawing at the beginning of last month? Well, on Sunday, at about 7:30 PM, deep in bowels of the Thirsty Theologian Complex, behind closed doors, amid hushed whispers and anxious nerves, two winners were selected to receive a copy of Assured by God: Living in the Fullness of God’s Grace. They are:

Bob Hayton

Bo Snagley

Congratulations, gentlemen. Now if you would just email me your mailing address, I'll get those out to you toute suite.

Uptate: The link above goes to Amazon. Monergism has it at a much better price.

This is one of those blog posts about blogging that I rarely read when others post them. Your time would be better spent clicking through.

Are they gone yet? OK, those of you who have nothing better to do and are still sitting in your parent's basement reading this, maybe you can answer a question. How does this Truth Laid Bear thing work? Does anyone know?

Back when I started blogging (May 2005), I was as much of a stats nerd as anyone. I registered my blog at truthlaidbear.com and joined the Blogdom of God (a title that seems hopelessly crass now) and the League of Reformed Bloggers. I watched my status—I think I acheived "Maurading Marsupial"—and got excited whenever I jumped a level. However, by the time I moved from thethirstytheologian.blogspot.com to thirstytheologian.com, I no longer cared. I didn't update my URL on any of those aggregators (I can't even remember my log-in at TTLB if I wanted to).

Yesterday, on a whim, I went to TTLB to check my status. I'm at 7698, right in the middle of the "Slithering Reptiles," in the neighborhood of, and even above, a couple of very fine blogs that I can't match for quality now, and certainly never did at that URL. 7698 out of 100,000+ blogs.

Folks, in case you've missed this point, this is not thirstytheologian.com I'm talking about. This is my abandoned blogspot blog. I am mystified. I know they haven't followed me here (could they do that?) because I get two to three times the traffic here that I ever got there, and about five times as many blogs link here, so whatever they go by, that doesn't fit.

I don't get it. Is TTLB as meaningless and useless as I think it is?

Jonathan Moorhead has tagged me to identify my worst and best post, a post on which I have changed my mind, and my most-commented-on post. So here they are:

Thirsty Theologian Worst post: I wrote a short post quite a while back on limited atonement that I disliked so much that I unpublished it. It was actually not a bad post. It was very Biblical, logical, and made its point quite well. Unfortunately, the point it made so well was not the point it claimed to make concerning the doctrine of limited atonement. In fact, according to its stated purpose, it was quite lame. I might, one day, republish it with a new title and introduction. Then it will be as brilliant as I originally thought it was.

Thirsty Theologian Best post: Saddam and I: Equally Unrighteous. See me in a rare moment of humility.

Thirsty Theologian Changed His Mind Post: None that I can recall. Yes, I am set in my ways. I have changed my mind on a few things since I began blogging, just not anything I’ve spouted off on here. One would be Modalism. I used to believe that Modalists were simply in error, but still genuine believers. I no longer believe that. Sorry, Bishop Jakes. Repent and believe, for the remission of your sins!

Thirsty Theologian Most Comments Post: I don’t know. Probably one in the God Gave C₂H₆O series. Controversy sells—better than beer.

“Tagged for humiliation” (Jonathan’s phrase):
• James White (because I would love to know if he’s ever changed his mind)
• Jason Robertson (because he needs another chance to rant about eschatology)
• Tim Challies (because he has never, ever, responded to a tag and I want to see if I can break his iron will)
• Brian Thornton (because he tagged me once, and it’s payback time)

As promised, the winnerof Iain Muray's Revival & Revivalism: The Making and Marring of American Evangelicalism, 1750–1858 was drawn yesterday morning by an entirely impartial set of seven-year-old fingers. The winner is:

Shannon Jordan.

Congratulations; I hope you enjoy the book. To the rest of you, better luck next time. I encourage you to buy the book yourselves, which you can do in a couple of ways. You can buy it from Amazon by clicking this link, which would send a few nickels my way and help pay for these drawings, or, what would please me even more, you can buy it here from Monergism.com, and support one of the most useful online Christian ministries.

Thanks to all for reading and entering.

. . . but I'm blogspotting this guy because he says I should, and because he apparently considers Chevy aficionados to be "misguided." He obviously has the gift of discernment. Also, because it's the weekend and I've got nothing else anyway. So go visit Chez Kneel. He's presently recycling posts on Leviticus, which is more interesting than you might expect.

Update: new, improved explanation.

I'm no computer tech nerd. My web skills are really quite basic, gained largely through trial & error and by clicking "view page source" on web pages with interesting features. But I'm a fiddler and a tinkerer, so I can seldom just leave a newly-discovered function alone without customizing it. That's not always a good thing. I've messed up a lot of perfectly good code by trying just one more modification. Sometimes though, I have a genuine "Eureka!" moment when I figure out something really good. Today, I want to share one of those "Eureka!" moments. The techies out there will be mostly unimpressed, but perhaps some of you will find this useful.

I don't like sending readers to sites with questionable content. For that reason, I prefer to embed YouTube videos rather than link to YouTube. However, embedded videos are one of the things that can cause your page to load slowly. Also, they clutter up the appearance of the page. I therefore wanted to make the video open alone in a popup window.

First, I scavenged the code from a page containing a popup image. In this case, it was from my own site. (Movable Type allows you to choose "popup" or "embedded" when uploading a file, and writes the code for you, so yes, I had done it before without knowing how.) Then I trimmed out the attributes I didn't need, such as scrollbars and the like. I then simply replaced the file URL with the YouTube video URL. This will not be the URL found in the address bar or to the right of the video on the YouTube page. It will be the URL found in the "embed" code directly below that, highlighted in red in this image. YouTube will not let you copy just the URL out of the "embed" code, so you will have to copy & paste the entire "embed" code and then copy the URL into your popup code. Just right-click on the "embed" code and click "copy." Then paste it into your blog post or any document. It will look like this:

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yBsGFAXw6d4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yBsGFAXw6d4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

The URL is the part in red type, and is the only part you will keep. Delete the rest. The code you need, with the URL copied from the code above, looks like this:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/yBsGFAXw6d4" onclick="window.open('http://www.youtube.com/v/yBsGFAXw6d4','popup', 'width=425, height=350'); return false">Where I learned My Computer Skills</a>

. . . and here's how it works:

Where I learned My Computer Skills

Now, here's another trick to give you further control over your content, this one thanks to the Desiring God blog. YouTube videos are automatically followed by a menu of related videos that you may or may not want appearing on your site. You can eliminate them by simply adding &rel=0 to the URL, like this:

http://www.youtube.com/v/yBsGFAXw6d4&rel=0

Finally, you can adjust the size of the video display by changing the width & height attributes, or go to full screen by simply omitting them. However, most YouTube videos are not of high enough resolution to display at full screen.

As I said, techies will be generally unimpressed with this, but my little brain thinks this is very cool. I hope someone finds it useful.

Don't be alarmed. It's just a picture. The actual book I'm giving away is much better. Well, the cover art is not as good, but the content will be much more satisfying. Here is how this will work this time. You email me by clicking here. Say whatever you want in the email, like maybe how brilliant, handsome, and charming I am, or make suggestions and offer constructive criticism, or say nothing at all if you prefer. Just include your name and make sure the subject line says "Book Give-away I," and you'll be entered in a drawing which will take place the first week in July. I am opening this first give-away to all who wish to enter. In the future, I may limit it to residents of the U.S. if shipping costs get out of hand.

And now, the book. I will be sending the lucky winner a book that I have recently finished (a new copy, not mine) and enjoyed very much. You may have read excerpts here, here, here, here, and here. It is Iain Murray's Revival & Revivalism: The Making and Marring of American Evangelicalism, 1750–1858. This is a good history of that era in America, and while more detail would have been nice at times, it could hardly be expected in only 480 pages covering over a century and the lives of dozens of significant men. At any rate, it is an excellent place to start and quite an engaging and easy read.

In the interest of promoting Christian education, and to expand my practice of promoting other people’s work, I’ve decided to do a periodic book give-away. I haven’t decide how often, but I am tentatively thinking it will be quarterly, or monthly, at most. Now, I need your input. I will probably begin with a simple drawing, but I would like to try something more creative, like a contest. However, I want it to be fair, and I haven’t thought of a contest that I could judge fairly. I would appreciate any clever ideas you might have.

I’m going to kill two birds with one 12-gauge light target load. First, Jen posted a quote from G.K. Chesterton that highlights a sad literary truth: “The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese.” Hard to believe, isn’t it? Sure, there may be a verse or two on cheese hidden away somewhere in a Shel Silverstein book, but I’m afraid this beautiful gift has been almost entirely, inexplicably, overlooked by the poets. I aim to rectify that.

Second, Brian, the sheepish one, has tagged me with one of those meme things. I reserve the right to arbitrarily choose to participate or not in any meme. Participation in this meme does not obligate me participate in any others. So there. So, here you go: cheese (or cheesy) poetry and 7 things that others may not know about me.

Cheese Couplets

Colby is fine, but what I like better
Is the lovely bouquet of extra-sharp cheddar.

For a good, tasty snack that will never miss,
Try a nice dunkel bier and a platter of Swiss.

My lips smack
When I eat Pepper Jack.

Grab a sheep and pull and squeeze—
That’s what it takes to make Bleu cheese.

Though Muenster cheese may sound quite German,
It’s American, like Munster (Herman).

Feta is a royal treat,
Although it smells a lot like feet.

When cheese smells bad, it means that it’s good—
I’d say that of my verses, if only I could.

7 Things about Me that You Might not Know

1. I scored high on my driver’s license and hunter’s safety tests. The rest of my academic record is a wreck. In spite of my lack of formal education, I am a grammar tyrant. If you use the word “like” improperly, I might correct you — even if you’re in the middle of a sermon. I even appreciate it when others correct my grammar, spelling, & punctuation. I also love math. I admire those guys who memorize π to a bunch of decimal places. Off-hand, I can do 3.141592. I’m such a nerd that I actually use all those digits when I do geometry.
2. Six of my eight children were born at home. I delivered four of them myself. My wife helped a little. She came in pretty handy.
3. I have worked with dairy, swine, and beef. Pigs are smarter than cows. Cows are smarter than sheep. Sheep are smarter than Democrats. Democrats are smarter than straw bales. I have also worked in construction. Straw bales are smarter than drywall hangers.
4. I‘ve been busted for drag racing on the highway. When I told my story — “We weren’t racing, I was just passing” — the judge laughed out loud. I was passing. Unfortunately, I was in the right lane.
5. I’ve only been kissed by two women other than my wife. The first was my boss’s wife at a New Year’s Eve party. I never saw it coming. The second was a girl in a bar in Glasgow, Montana, who found out it was my birthday. I’m pretty sure she had thrown up recently. My kissing experiences after that have been much better.
6. Andrea Bocelli is my favorite tenor. Christopher Parkening is my favorite guitarist. Yet I have a few Hank Williams tracks on my computer.
7. My rugged good looks are only rivaled by my poetic skill.

There you go. Am I not a wonder to behold?

I've been working for the past 2+ weeks on my wife's computer, which, in technological terms, can best be described as a Girl's Computer®. It serves its function quite well, but it is definitely a weaker vessel compared to my Manly Machine®. Worse than the absent muscle is the desk setup, which is very uncomfortable for me. Anyway, I've been putting off fixing mine for reasons of time and economics. I have been busy trying to get some home remodeling done prior to the fast-approaching graduation shindig for my eldest daughter. That should explain both the time and economic constraints.

I've decided to come back, at least in a limited capacity, in spite of the present difficulties, because an amazing number of you keep coming even when I post nothing at all. Why do you do that? Is it the handsome picture at the head of the blog? Whatever it is, here I am, at your service. I spent the day going through my Bloglines, which I had not looked at since the crash, and I have posted one big Bucket O' Links. You may have already read many of them, but there they are.

I also want to direct you to some other good sources you can glean links from. First, as you likely already know, Challies A La Carte brings some great links that I never would come across in my reading. Then, of course, there is the King of linkage, Justin Taylor at Between Two Worlds. More recently, Ken Fields has installed a copycat to my On the Web blog. He does such a good job that I'm considering plugging it into my sidebar and hoping no one notices. Not really--his colors wouldn't match.

I'll post something more substantive soon, at least by next Lord's Day. Thanks for hanging in there with me.

I'm sitting at my wife's computer, cursing technology--or, rather, my dependence on technology that fails. After six years of mostly faithful service, my computer has crashed. Hopefully, I'll get it fixed fairly soon, but until then, I'll be mostly off-line. While I'm gone, take a look at The World from Our Window. Ken Fields is working on a sidebar links thingy similiar to my On the Web links.

Note to Jonathan Moorhead: Stop gloating. I will not be getting a Mac.

Loki will not be bringing us a Saturday Stupidity post today. I could make excuses for him, such as that he has been very busy while on sabbatical in Iceland working on his Doctoral dissertation (Pickled Herring in Nordic Theology), but the fact is that he is growing tired of it. He has suggested that I fill in for him, but I am really not that funny. We might revive regular Saturday Stupidity posts sometime in the future, but for now Loki might just pop in occasionally on a Saturday, we might fill in with something else at times, or we might just let the blog sleep.

Have a nice weekend.

Steve Weaver has listed the books he read in 2006 (Shocking discovery: the Bible is not on the list!). Steve’s list got me thinking about my own reading, and the reading plan that I’ve been planning to plan for 2007, but have not yet planned; but I’m still planning on it.

I will be reading through the Bible in this nifty new 1599 Geneva Bible with updated spelling.

I want to read fewer contemporary works and more dead theologians this year. This is where you, dear reader, can help me. I’m looking for your recommendations of specific works in the following categories:

Church fathers
Reformers
Puritans

I am also hoping to read more church history. I have Schaff’s History of the Christian Church and D’Aubigne’s History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century. What are your favorite church history books? Do you know of a good single volume church history?

Tell me: what should I read in 2007?

Recommendations so far (that I don't already have):

Augustine, The City of God and The Trinity

John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion

Jonathan Edwards, The Religious Affections and Charity and its Fruits
Nathanael Ranew, Solitude Improved by Divine Meditation
Thomas Vincent, The True Christian's Love to the Unseen Christ
Thomas Watson, All Things for Good and The Art of Divine Contentment
John Owen, The Death of Death in the Death of Christ
Jeremiah Burroughs, The Rare Jewel of Christian Contentment
William Gurnell, The Christian In Complete Armor
J.C. Ryle, Warnings to the Churches

A.M. Renwick, The Story of the Church
Roland Bainton, Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther
Alister McGrath, A Life of John Calvin: A Study in the Shaping of Western Culture
Iain Murray, Jonathan Edwards: A new biography
Arnold Dallimore, George Whitefield: The Life and Times of the Great Evangelist of the Eighteenth Century

Bloggers who have nothing to say write about their cats. At least that is what I have observed. Today I am writing about my cat. Draw your conclusions as you will.

When we lived in the country, we always had cats. We had to. It was either cats or mice, and we chose cats. Those cats were not pets, they were livestock—not like cattle, because we didn’t eat them, but like horses, because they had a job to do. When we moved to town, we didn’t bring any cats with us.

Then, last week, a kitten walked into the house and decided to stay. This one, I guess, is a pet. Her name is Dagmar. She hasn’t done a lick of work since she arrived, and I doubt she ever will. She sleeps a lot. When she wakes up, two little girls harass her until she makes a break for my office, where she climbs up my leg and promptly falls asleep on my lap. Sometimes she climbs across my keyboard, typing in tongues. I will be reading Charismatic Chaos to her soon. At least she meows in English.

So, now I have blogged about my cat. Can I sink much lower? Well, yes, I suppose I could have posted pictures, but then I would never be able to look in the mirror again, regardless of how devastatingly handsome I am. Here is a cat picture for anyone who cares to see one. It’s not our cat—I wish it was.

I wonder if this is what they call jumping the shark.

Once again I am reminded of my own mortality. I guess I should have expected it, but when my "King for a Week" status stretched out to a fortnight, I suppose I began to settle into the throne a bit too comfortably. I began wondering what I had done to deserve my removal, but then I remembered that I hadn't done anything to deserve the crown in the first place, so I guess it's all fair. It should remind us all, though, that we can't put our trust in earthly kingdoms.

But seriously, I am thankful for the honor. Readership of this humble blog more than doubled for those two weeks. Maybe some of those readers will stay. Thanks to all of you who flatter me by reading my unoriginal, inconsistant postings. I hope you get something worthwhile out of your time here.

My successor to the throne is New Attitude. Long live the King! For a week or so, anyway.

Matthew Sims, one of the eminent writers at The World from our Window and proprietor of Under Sovereign Grace has offered a collection of John Piper sermons on CD for free. All I have to do is post a link his websites and to my favorite John Piper book, and a top ten list of my favorite theologians and books. So here you go, in no particular order:

Books
The Gospel According to Jesus by John MacArthur
Our Sufficiency in Christ by John MacArthur
Reckless Faith by John MacArthur
Ashamed of the Gospel by John MacArthur
The Psalms and Hymns of Isaac Watts by Isaac Watts
The Bondage of the Will by Martin Luther
Pilgrim’s Progress by John Bunyan
Not a Chance by R.C. Sproul
The Treasury of David by Charles Spurgeon
The Westminster Pulpit by G. Campbell Morgan

Theologians
Matthew Sims (sucking up can’t hurt)
John MacArthur
R.C. Sproul
John Bunyan
John Calvin
Martin Luther
Isaac Watts
Francis Schaffer
Charles Spurgeon
Michael Beasley

What, me, a king? Well, actually, yes. Even before Tim Challies, Pope of Christian Blogdom, crowned me King for a Week, I was predestined to the throne. Consider these facts:

In the French deck of cards, the Kings, Queens, and Jacks have names. The King of Hearts is “Charles,” probably after Charles the Great (Charlemagne), or possibly King Charles VII of France. The King of Diamonds is “César,” probably after Julius Cæsar. The King of Clubs is “Alexandre,” probably after Alexander the Great. The King of Spades, which you see here, is none other than {insert trumpet fanfare here} “David,” most likely after the King of Israel.

You will also notice that the French card has “R” for “Roi” where we are accustomed to seeing “K” for “King.” My middle name is “Leroy,” derived from the French “le roi.” From the day of my birth, I have been David the King.

I am told that “David” means “beloved,” which has nothing to do with any of this. It just adds a bit of warm fuzziness to this otherwise emotionless post.

So, welcome to my kingdom. Wipe your feet on the rug and come on in. We have a couple of small feasts planned for this week, but as usual, the best we have is plundered from neighboring castles. See the sidebar, under On the Web, for the freshest victuals.

Tomorrow, we have a very distinguished guest blogger lined up. See you then, and thanks for visiting.

I stumbled onto this link somewhere, and... well, I don't normally do things like this, but after my eschatology post last week, I thought maybe I should stick with something more on my level. Anyway, it was kind of fun for about five minutes, and it turned out about how I expected.

I don't know where the 10% Yankee comes from. It must have been that weekend I spent in New Hampshire & Massachusetts a few years ago, although the pastor of the church we visited was from Minnesota.

I'm especially proud of that 0% Dixie. Sorry, Phillip, Jason & Scott, Steve, and Jeremy. I still like listening to your sermons. Substance over style, you know. I wonder who else I've offended? Probably Jonathan, but I've never actually heard his voice, so I'm just guessing.

My apologies as well to all you blokes and blokettes (or whatever the proper vernacular is) that are no doubt feeling quite left out. The quiz just wasn't multi-cultural enough, was it?*

Memes – who started this? Well, I’ve been tagged with one. Normally, I would ignore it, but today I am just tickled pink to be noticed by Eminent Canadian Philosopher and Theologian® Daniel that I simply must comply. So here it is.

1. One book that changed your life (other than the Bible):

The Gospel According to Jesus. As a fire-breathing Arminian, I only let MacArthur get his foot in the door because he challenged “free grace” theology, which I despised then almost as much as I do now. It was all uphill from there.

2. One book you've read more than once:

The Monkey in the Rocket. I still have the hardcover that my mother read to me. It’s a classic, written in the early days of the space program, before we had been to the moon.

3. One book you'd want on a Desert Island:

This Bible.

4. One book that made you laugh:

The Texas Baptist Crucible: Tales from the Temple

5. One book that made you cry (or feel really sad):

The Texas Baptist Crucible: Tales from the Temple

6. One book that you wish had been written:

I Take It All Back by Rick Warren.

7. One book that you wish had never been written:

The Prayer of Jabez – I know there are far worse books that have done much more damage. However, in my little world, I have not seen so many people fall so blindly into blatantly unbiblical theology as I have when that waste of paper was published.

8. One Book You're Currently Reading:

I am about to read Humility: True Greatness by C.J. Mahaney. I don’t normally read charismatics, but a friend with excellent discernment sent it to me, so I expect it to be good. If not, at least it’s short.

9. One Book you've been meaning to read:

The Freedom of the Will by Jonathan Edwards. I’ve been meaning to read it for a long tome, but it is hard, and I am lazy and dull.

10. Now tag five people:

Everybody! Everyone should do it! Yes! OK, get started!

Well, look here, I’ve even decided to do it twice, once for real, and once as “Joe Spiritual.” Most of you know Joe. Some of you are Joe. Those of you who haven’t met him yet, will. He’s the guy who, when invited to play a game of Bible Trivia, looks grieved, and in a somber voice says, “Is anything in the Bible trivial?” He is not only not of the world, he’s not even in it.

Joe Spiritual version:

1. One book that changed your life (other than the Bible):

Other than the Bible? Brother, I will pray for you. May God show you that only the Bible can really change your life! Cry out to him for spiritual eyes to see, before it’s too late!

2. One book you've read more than once:

The Bible, of course. O, and Foxe’s Book of Martyrs. It changed my life.

3. One book you'd want on a Desert Island:

The Bible – or something by Watchman Nee.

4. One book that made you laugh:

Laugh?

5. One book that made you cry (or feel really sad):

That’s difficult to choose. Most of what I was assigned in high school, I guess. I was always thinking, “What is the eternal value of American history or algebra?” That time could have been spent more wisely, I think.

6. One book that you wish had been written:

I wish there was a book explaining how important it is to be really, really serious all the time. I think people get the wrong idea from all those verses about joy. Real joy is found in solemnity.

7. One book that you wish had never been written:

Song of Solomon. Was that really necessary? How many times do we need to read “breasts” or “kisses?” And the innuendo! Pomegranates, indeed. Remember how it got to John-boy Walton? I don’t think that’s edifying at all. Also, anything by Charles Swindoll. He smiles too much – obviously does not take his calling seriously.

8. One Book You're Currently Reading:

Since you ask, I’m editing my first book. It’s called True Humility and How I Attained It.

9. One Book you've been meaning to read:

Strong’s Concordance - I’d like to have it memorized before I get stranded on that desert island with my Bible.

10. Now tag five people:

Let’s see… I don’t know five people who are serious enough. OK, how about my pastor and my mom.

continue reading Why Not, It’s Friday

continue reading Saturday Stupidity: Anniversary Edition

continue reading Correction

continue reading I'm Not Here

continue reading Taking a Break

continue reading Where You're From & Where I've Been

continue reading Happy Birthday, Sweetheart!

continue reading 01:02:03 04/05/06

continue reading Blogroll Update

continue reading New Address

continue reading Saturday Stupidity Special Edition

continue reading Contest Wrap-up

continue reading Weekend Contest

continue reading Meet the New Guy

continue reading 7

continue reading Why the Geneva Bible?

continue reading Stuff about me, if you must know